Emergent Church Movement

On Sunday, I was handed a news release entitled, "Emergent church movement comes to Sandpoint." The article was written by David Gunter, who is a feature correspondent for the Bonner County Daily.

 

The article is announcement of a new church start, I suppose in Sandpoint, located somewhere in Bonner County. It compares the present situation of the Church of Jesus Christ with that of the Great Reformation and even the human history of Jesus. Quoting the new start Pastor, Bob Evans, the article suggests that the Catholic Church at the time of Martin Luther failed to appreciate the radical actions and demands of the movement that resulted from Luther's theological disagreement with the Church. In the same vein, the Temple and synagogue at the time of Jesus failed to embrace his challenge to their traditional faith practices.

 

Evan's argument is that the Church today resides amid the chaos of such change. Like the 500 year cycle of seismic shifts that are suggested in Phyllis Tickle's "The Great Emergence," today's cultural changes demand that the Church of Jesus Christ change radically. If the Church is to survive, if it is to remain relevant to and within the newly developing culture, that Church will need to recapture a form of faith that precedes Pauline Christianity. That is, we need to recover the faith formation and spirituality of the "Historical Jesus." 

 

There is nothing new here for those who have been striving for decades to understand the cultural changes that necessitate spiritual evolution. Shiloh Church has been laboring for years to become the "Emergent Church" in a traditional setting. The questions raised by the article are important, but perhaps for a much different reason that the author or the Pastor intended.

 

The question is not whether or not a new church start can be the Emergent Church. The question is whether existing congregations, some traditional and historical, can change to become the Emergent Church. Is it possible for existing congregations to retool, both theologically and practically, to represent the faith and spirituality of Jesus? Is it necessary for existing congregations to go out of existence and new church starts to replace them? Can the Church be reformed?

 

The evidence remains mixed, even at Shiloh. Can the congregation represent emergent thinking and theology? Can it free itself enough from trappings of traditional and historical Christianity that it becomes relevant once again in a newly developing culture? Can a church population, traditionally and historically trained, change its thinking and behavior, or will everyone leave? 

 

Shiloh is, in many ways, a test case for the Emerging Church movement. Our time, talent, prayers and effort have, for more than a decade now, been dedicated to developing an emergent theology and practice from the traditional and historical foundations of the Church of Jesus Christ.

 

Shiloh relies upon the dedication, vision and focus of its members and friends to direct us toward cultural and social relevancy. We wish Sandpoint the very best in its new church start. We will pray for them. Perhaps they are the future of the Church of Jesus Christ.

 

See You Sunday!