Authenticity

Members and friends of Shiloh Church have been discussing the character and nature of the Emergent Church throughout the month of April at the church's Bible @ Boston's series. The conversations have been important for shaping Shiloh's next steps into a somewhat hazy future. Those who came have talked about worship, structure and organization, authority (Biblical and otherwise) and definitions of that movement.

 

Following the final series' discussion, a person approached me and said what I believe to be at the core of the Emergent Church movement. She said, as nearly as I can recall, "It seems like the Emergent Church is an authentic witness to the ministry of Jesus Christ, without all the trappings." What she meant, I think, is that the Emergent movement allows the Church of Jesus Christ to move from traditional arrangements around practice of the faith to direct application in the community. The Emergent Church, at least at this point in its spiritual development, is less concerned with buildings, decorations, pageantry, appearances and positions of authority than it is with an authentic Christ-centered life-style.

 

While the traditions of the institutional configurations of the Church deal primarily with private practices that take place within the walls of any given congregation, the Emergent Church movement pushes the witness through the walls to the community. It is a public act of faith, a public witness. The Emergent Church cares less about what songs we sing as part of our corporate worship as what help we as persons provide in and to our communities. The Emergent Church cares less about how we practice Sacrament as how Sacrament leads to mission and ministry in the public arena.

 

I therefore agree with the woman's assessment. The Emergent Church movement, at the current level of spiritual development, seeks a more authentic public witness of Jesus Christ, not as much in words as acts. It is precisely this level of authenticity that resonates with community needs and public demand on the Church of Jesus Christ. A lack of such authenticity is, I think, the primary reason that we have created such a large population within the church alumni association. It certainly makes up the bulk of public claims of church hypocrisy.

 

In short, I firmly believe that the Emergent Church movement is a next step in the spiritual evolution of the Church of Jesus Christ. It is a step away from traditional trappings of the faith and embrace of genuine public work that defines the faith. While the movement steps on toes of traditional religious practice, I can imagine that it might revitalize the Church universal, calling it beyond itself to the community to which it is sent.

 

What do you think?