Personal Salvation

As many of those who read The Shiloh Insider are aware, I have been teaching a class at the University of Dayton Osher Lifelong Learning Center, entitled "A Bible Toolbox." The class is made up of persons who are 50+, who have a desire to expand their education and extend their knowledge. The class is made up of persons of many different faith expressions and backgrounds. Thus far, the class has been a rousing success, with participants learning to use historical and literary contexts as a means of studying and understanding Biblical literature.

Today, Monday, February 6, several of the class participants remained after the class was completed in order to engage in discussion. The discussion resulted from a series of comments that I had made during an investigation of the New Testament historical context.

During the class, I suggested that Jesus was concerned with shaping a particular ethic, one that, if lived faithfully, would repair, from the bottom upward, the broken social systems of Jesus' age, which functioned from the top downward. We pictured that ethic as the "downy/uppy" of the Crucifixion and Resurrection. In that image, Jesus embodies a way of life in which persons willingly and intentionally sacrifice themselves in order to serve others. This service is embodied in order to free those whom Jesus served from obstacles to their service to others. Virtue takes place when followers of Jesus embrace the ethic, live in service to others, empowering them, enabling them, removing the obstacles that keep them from serving others.

The conversation that took place after class today centered on that ethic as "works," and how those works lead to an understanding of salvation. The question was, "How are we saved by practicing that ethic?" The qualifying statements demonstrated that the person was asking about the difference between salvation by grace or salvation by works. "Which is it," he wanted to know.

The same gentleman had asked a similar question earlier in the day. He asked, "If Jesus were living today, would he be Republican or Democrat?" I told him that I seriously doubted that Jesus would have had any stake in the political process, and would therefore be neither. Jesus worked by weaving the fabric that ties each of us to the other, from the bottom up, as it were. Jesus would have believed that the political processes were broken, and that the means of repairing them lay exclusively in developing the space that exists between each person and each other. The ethic determines how we fill that space and what we do in the developing relationships.

The same answer holds for the question of personal salvation. I do not think that it was much of an issue for Jesus. Jesus may never have asked, or wondered, whether persons are saved through grace or works because personal salvation was never an issue for Jesus. Heaven or Hell, or how we achieve either, is not a concern for him. Salvation by either works or grace miss the point of a salvation that is established in relationship between one's self and every other. Jesus embraces communal salvation, qualitative, historical, practical. Salvation comes in the way that we live with one another, establishing, from the bottom up, a way of life that is then demanded of the systems that form social culture.

So, questions of personal salvation are likely as foreign to Jesus as those of political association might be. Would Jesus be a Republican or Democrat? Well, neither, because Jesus did not work that way. Would Jesus support personal salvation through grace or works? Well, again, neither. Jesus probably did not work that way. His concern was how we lived together, as a community, as a family, as children of the same creator.

That such a conversation takes place at all is testament to the success of the University of Dayton Lifelong Learning Institute, and the curiosity and openness of those who continue to pursue greater understanding. I am proud to take part in the process.